It's been a while, and it's actually been a couple eventful weeks, it's hard to know where to start. Let's start at the very end:
No classes today, there's nothing but 5 finals standing behind me and the greatest summer yet. Right now I'm trying to work up motivation to go running. It's a bit cold outside today, and running is probably my least favorite form of exercise. Unless I have a ball, or a finish line, or a new mountain to run up, it's hard for me to justify running. So far I've put on some ankle socks and I'm loading stuff onto my iPod, which might help. Either way, I need to start running. I have an epic mud race in may with Amy, and I'm not sure if I can run 4 miles at the moment, especially if I'm going to have to be climbing over walls and stuff while doing it.
Yesterday I made pineapple cheesecake cupcakes, in honor of the psych season finale (which was great). They were based on this recipe, which i believe is based on one by Martha Stewart. Remember when Martha Stewart was a thing? I also made asparagus, which turned out ok, but it made my pee smell weird, so I must have done something right. I cooked for my friend, his girlfriend, and her roommate with whom I went to a soccer game last week. It was fun, although there was an overabundance of cuteness between the happy couple. It made talking to them just a little awkward.
On Tuesday I officially got into a laboratory here at BYU. It's sort of a big deal. I'll be working with Dr. Kauwe, who was one of my favorite professors I've had and a big reason I decided to go into biology. I haven't cured cancer yet, but I did do some data entry. It seems like most science always turns out a bit more mundane in practice than you'd expect, but I have had a lot of practice with mundane work, and I imagine it does get more sciencey eventually.
Sunday was Easter. I feel like Easter is not my biggest fan. Last year I found myself unexpectedly single on Easter, this year I found myself skidding across the pavement in the middle of an intersection. My roommate was gone so I decided to ride my scooter to church, which took me on this nice road with a speed limit of 50 mph. It was great, because I finally got to see how powerful my scooter actually is. I managed to get it up to about 65, which was a lot less terrifying than I expected. On the way back though, I was going 60 up a slight hill, and my scooter cut out and slowed down a bit. It kept going, but I noticed the steering was a little stiff. I know think that's because I had a flat tire and didn't realize it, but at the time I wasn't sure if it was just because I was going fast or what. Anyway, I slowed down as I came up to the intersection, so I was going about 20 as I went around the corner, but I completely lost control, crashed my scooter, and cut up my hands pretty nicely. Luckily most of the damage was to my helmet, which doesn't bleed. Hooray for helmets!
I've learned two things from my several accidents. First, I don't do well learning things theoretically. Practical experience seems to stick a lot better. Now I know what it feels like to get a flat tire and what not to do, so let that be a lesson to you. I think there must be a way to learn this sort of thing from a book, or a course, or some other way that doesn't involve bleeding, but I'm not sure how.
The other thing I've learned is people are great. When I crashed my bike, before I had really figured out what was going on, there was already someone at my side calling an ambulance and making sure I was ok. This time, a bunch of my friends stopped on their way back from church, as well as random people that stopped to make sure I was ok. They (my friends) helped me get my scooter back to my house, which wasn't too far away, and helped patch me up a bit. That was great.
Saturday we hiked the hot springs, which was awesome. I think it's my favorite hike. It's beautiful, and you get there and you have a stinky natural hot tub. It's great! But then just like real hot tubs, after we had been there for an hour or two a group of about 20 guys with a couple girls showed up, and made it lame. No one likes a crowded hot tub. So that's when we left, we'd been shooting to get there so that we could hike out by the full moon, but I didn't take into account that the full moon doesn't actually get above the mountains until around 11 o'clock. But we had flashlights, so that worked.
Friday...was pretty boring as Fridays go. I watched a couple movies. Nothing fancy.
Thursday was soccer night. This could be a whole post in itself. We've been playing in the parking garage underneath Zion's bank. It's really cool, and you get this awesome, cinematic, soccer hooligan feel when you're playing. It was a great night, we had about 10 people show up, and they had just put new lights in so it was a bit brighter and felt even more legit. After about an hour of playing, I was out wide and I tried to cross it into the center, but it went just a tiny bit high and caught a pipe. We've hit pipes all the time, usually it's fine, but this time as the soccer ball hit it we hear the super loud PSSSSSSSSHHHHHH of gas escaping. We ran, both out of fear of dying and fear of getting arrested. After maybe 30 seconds, water started shooting out, so we were less afraid of dying, but just as afraid of being arrested. But, as will happen, once we got outside, the better angels of our nature took over and we felt like we should call somebody to let them know. We weren't quite sure who to call, someone called the police and they and the fire department came. Turns out I had kicked the head of a sprinkler system for the fire extinguisher. They took our names down but didn't give us a citation or anything. I called zions bank the next day, and they were pretty cool about it too. For a while I was worried I'd have to pay a bunch of money to fix it, but I had just read this talk about owning up to your mistakes and accepting the consequences of your actions, it felt sort of cold to run off after that.
Wednesday I went to a Real Salt Lake game with a couple people. It was fun, I decided I want to be a RSL fan, because soccer games are so cool. Where else is it normal to throw streamers at the players? The game itself was pretty boring for a soccer game. RSL got one goal at the beginning off a penalty in the box, and then for the rest of the game they mostly played for possession, and Montreal didn't
seem to care that much about getting the ball back. The last five or so minutes were pretty intense, but for the most part it was a slow game. Still fun, and free, which is always a plus.
Well now it's raining, so running seems unlikely, but I do have to go into work and swing by the genetics lab, so getting wet seems inescapable.
And that's my week. Seven days of pretty exciting things. The next few days are pretty promising too, a couple dates, a couple finals, living the dream.
Congratulations for surviving this far, truly your interest in my life is inspiring. Maybe I'll go less than a month before the next one, that seems likely, since from Wednesday on it's just work and adventure all summer long.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Saturday, March 17, 2012
A short, visual update of the past few weeks
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
And now for something completely different:
I put a lot of thought and time into this paper Sadly I didn't put a lot of time in the actual writing, I managed to put it off, literally until the 11th hour (I started at 11, it was due at 1) so there are likely some mistakes, but it's an interesting topic. For the sake of conciseness and having a solid and permissibly biased argument, I didn't spend a ton of time on the studies that back up vouchers, but there's substantial (albeit contradictory) information about the success of vouchers in a few places. It's worth reading about, if you're into that sort of thing.
I put a lot of thought and time into this paper Sadly I didn't put a lot of time in the actual writing, I managed to put it off, literally until the 11th hour (I started at 11, it was due at 1) so there are likely some mistakes, but it's an interesting topic. For the sake of conciseness and having a solid and permissibly biased argument, I didn't spend a ton of time on the studies that back up vouchers, but there's substantial (albeit contradictory) information about the success of vouchers in a few places. It's worth reading about, if you're into that sort of thing.
The
Race for the Finnish: Why Vouchers Won't Solve American Education
American education
is broken. America, which once led the world in education, has
fallen far behind other developed countries, now ranking around 20th worldwide. As a solution, some suggest a voucher
program as a way to let the invisible hand of the free market create
better schools. This idea is flawed. In practice vouchers are not
an easy, catch-all solution, and could perhaps make things even
worse. What is needed is a greater paradigm shift in the way we
approach education.
First of all, what
is the purpose of education? Some see education in a utilitarian view as a means to stimulate the economy and domestic prosperity. Others
see it in terms of egalitarianism: that education is the cure for the
inequality in our society, the means whereby the poor can rise up out
of poverty and achieve success. In either case, there is little
conclusive evidence that vouchers work. Private school students,
when adjusted for income, perform essentially the same as public
school students, or in some cases worse. The greatest determination
in educational achievement is not schooling or race but economic
conditions. In general, the rich do well wherever they are, the poor
do poorly. Thus private systems, already driven by free market
principles, have yet to outperform the public schools in a
significant way. From an egalitarian perspective, vouchers are
plainly ill equipped for equality. In a free market the richest will
always be able afford the best and the poorest will be forced to
settle for the worst. This is how schools are now; the rich can
afford to live in areas with good public schools and choose between
public and private, and the poor are stuck with their ineffective
local public schools. In this sense vouchers probably could not make
things much worse, but equality has never been the goal or the
product of capitalism.
Logistically alone
vouchers are problematic. Typically the proposed vouchers would
cover around $3,000. Let us be generous and say it was $5,000. The
average cost of private school is over $10,000. It is lower at
religious schools, which are often non-profit models. At non-affiliated,
assumably more capitalistic institutions, the average cost is over $16,000.
The cost of educating a public school student is $10,000. Even
accounting for the supposed greater efficiency of private
institutions, it is difficult to imagine that a voucher would provide
better choices, when there is little incentive for a private entity
to seek out the business of losing money while educating.
Even for
conservatives there are important considerations for vouchers. It is
still a government imposed redistribution of wealth. The rich are
still paying more in taxes to fund the education of the poor. Those
without children are paying for the education of those with children,
assuming they do not get their money back. In addition, since
private schools would be receiving government funds, the government
would undoubtably want some control over how that money is spent. In
many ways, vouchers would destroy many of the supposed advantages of
private schools. A better option for conservatives who do not want
to be paying for other children would be to simply reduce taxes and
cut government spending on education, but this is harder to sell to
the public.
The argument for
vouchers invokes the mystical free market which unavoidably solves
all these problems. There would be no great costs, because supply
and demand would ensure competitive rates. Private schools would be
so effective that the cost of educating a student would drop
dramatically, allowing for even lower costs. Institutional
structures could be established to ensure that problems of unfairness
were taken care of (although this in itself is a step back from the
free market that would supposedly fix everything). Even public
schools, forced to compete with private schools, would perform better
as the monopoly of socialist education was eliminated. To be fair,
these are valid arguments, and there is evidence for them. Several
studies of voucher programs have shown some success, even improvement
for the public schools nearby. However, it is hardly conclusive.
One of the longest and most complete experiments in free market
schooling occurred in Chile, which for over a decade implemented the
voucher system under the guidance of Chicago economists. What
happened was a near collapse of their education system. Graduation
rates dropped dramatically and over all performance declined. It is
easy to argue that there were confounding factors, but it is clear
that the free market failed to overcome the challenges of educating a
nation. A similar effort in Sweden has produced a thoroughly average
education system, one that falls just behind The United States in
world rankings.
Whether or not
vouchers would help is a complicated issue. They have produced some
success and some failure in the various locations in which they have
been implemented, but it is clear that they are unlikely on their own
to catapult our country back to the forefront of education. I do not
presume to know the solution for this, but it is my feeling that a
larger change is necessary. American schools are focused so much on
'performance' that they fail to educate. In Finland, which
consistently places first or second in world rankings, the education
system is absolutely different from ours. It is completely
centralized, with a standardized curriculum across all schools and
colleges, which are free. Kindergarten starts at age seven,
following an extensive pre-schooling program, teachers are highly
respected and becoming a teacher is highly competitive, not
withstanding the pay being comparable to teachers here. There is
little standardized testing, and grades are not even given until high
school, and even then no rankings are established. The focus of the
system is not on competition or performance, but on equality,
ensuring that every student has as great an opportunity as every
other. From an american view point, the whole system seems so
european. But the results are difficult to deny, especially in light
of the fact that Finland actually spends less per student than the
United States.
Clearly it is not a
question of money, or incentive, but in the culture of education.
Somehow, in our race to outperform everyone else, we are leaving our
children behind, even as we are being beaten by countries whose only
goals are equality. If America expects to be competitive in the
global economy, and if we desire to provide an equal chance to all
children, we must learn from the Finnish model. We must accept that
there is no single, simple, solution to such a complicated problem
and begin to determine how we can go about completely changing the
culture of education.
Acknowledgments:
There
are various sites I read in thinking about this issue, and I've
referred to several of their findings, although with little
specificity. In all honesty I ran out of time to do an effective
bibliography, but for fairness here are the sites that I read and
some of their main points:
http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/OP111.pdf
: Adjusted for economics and such, public schools generally perform
better than private/charter schools.
http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/001779.html:
Finland the best school system in the world?
http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=66
avg student cost: 10,000
http://www.cato.org/pubs/briefs/bp-025.html
avg private school cost 3000?
http://www.capenet.org/facts.html
avg private school costs 8500, non sectarian: 17,000
http://www.lobbyline.com/whyvouchersarebad.htm
Some conservative arguments against vouchers
I also read a bit of Chile's free-market miracle: a second look. This is a good book on vouchers in Chile, it's on google.
As a bit of an after though, it didn't quite fit into the paper, but I was thinking about how intelligence is portrayed in the public. If we are going to continue to call intelligence elitism, attack higher education as secular, vilify teachers as incompetent and lazy, and remove all responsibility from parents and children for their performance, performance which is measured by artificial tests which don't necessarily translate into real knowledge, should we really be surprised that our education isn't the best?
Monday, March 12, 2012
So if you're lonely
The plan was to do my homework, but I am mysteriously sleepy. I'm going to blame taco bell, I don't know how that could have been a good idea. I'm going to try to tell a linear story, we'll see how this goes:
A few weeks ago, I realized I needed to give myself a budget. I had gotten a raise at the MTC, and I was falling into the habit of spending money because I could. Zappos sent me a free vip membership, so I bought some shoes. Threadless kept telling me about these great deals, so I bought several T-shirts. Spencer (my cousin) tipped me off to a super cheap bike on KSL, so I bought it. My computer broke, on account of being dropped, so I had to pay two of my friends gas money to drive me up to Salt Lake twice over the course of two days in order to have it fixed at the apple store. Not withstanding having bought lots of really great things at really good prices, I realized I needed to control myself a little.
Then, I was checking ksl for scooters as I often did, and I the scooter I've been waiting for all this time. It was a tiny bit more than I was hoping to pay (I wanted to pay around $450) but it was perfect. And then the weather became perfect, and on a bit of a whim, I called the guy, and bought it. Having never driven a scooter before, and not having a helmet, driving it home at night was one of the more nerve wracking experiences in recent history, but I didn't die, so that was a huge success.
The second day of owning a scooter was a bit of a trial of my scooter faith. I realized I had to get it registered and insured and deal with all these absurd laws and taxes and things that just don't exist for bikes. Then I went to start it and I couldn't get it to start. I tried with the kick start for about 20 minutes, and finally got it, and then turned it off to run in for my stuff, and then when I came back i couldn't get it to work for an hour or so. I finally got a friend to jump start it, so that I could drive it to the inspection place so that I could get it registered, I got there and they failed it for the tire tread, and informed me that I needed a new tire. I had already read that these people were a little over zealous in their problem finding and a little slothful in their problem fixing, so I kindly rejected their offer to fix the tire for $80. Once again, I couldn't get it started, so I had to ask them to jump it, which they graciously did for free. It was a beautiful day though, and driving my scooter home was basically amazing. That day I was talking to my friend about it and he told me of a magical place that would pass scooter inspections in all but the most serious cases. I had hope.
The next day I set off for the Sinclair on Center st. Miraculously, my scooter kickstarted on the third try, and I drove it all the way there without any problems, then I left it running for about half an hour while they took care of everything, so as to recharge the battery. And it passed, with flying colors. I drove it back home, and bought some helmets, so that I would could stop tearing up (from the wind) and stop worrying about dying (from the road). The next day was sunday, and after our weekly brunch I went to show a couple of the girls my scooter. This was a big step in scooter ownership. I tried to start it, but it didn't work, but then the kick start worked relatively easily, and it was lots of fun to give them rides around the parking lot. I resisted the powerful urge to drive the scooter to church, and around town in the afternoon, since I still lacked license, registration, and a helmet.
Anyway, to wrap up: after the initial rocky start, it's been a dream. I managed to take care of my license, registration, and insurance today, and my helmets are in the mail. I had no idea how absurdly fun owning a scooter would be, it's totally worth the money I've spent,
Which brings us back to the budget. Having been wholly unsuccessful in creating a budget, my new budget is that I'm not allowed to buy anything unnecessary during the month of march. We'll see how much money I have when march ends, and then I might continue it through april. We found a really good deal on summer rent though ($65 a month) so I'll catch up pretty quickly.
So that's the saga of how I spent way more money than I should have in the space of about a week, I'll put some pictures up once I take them. That was supposed to happen today, but it got dark before I got around to it. If you find yourself considering buying a scooter, my only advice is to do it quickly. My main regret is that I didn't buy a scooter last year at this time when I was considering it; so much time wasted.
A few weeks ago, I realized I needed to give myself a budget. I had gotten a raise at the MTC, and I was falling into the habit of spending money because I could. Zappos sent me a free vip membership, so I bought some shoes. Threadless kept telling me about these great deals, so I bought several T-shirts. Spencer (my cousin) tipped me off to a super cheap bike on KSL, so I bought it. My computer broke, on account of being dropped, so I had to pay two of my friends gas money to drive me up to Salt Lake twice over the course of two days in order to have it fixed at the apple store. Not withstanding having bought lots of really great things at really good prices, I realized I needed to control myself a little.
Then, I was checking ksl for scooters as I often did, and I the scooter I've been waiting for all this time. It was a tiny bit more than I was hoping to pay (I wanted to pay around $450) but it was perfect. And then the weather became perfect, and on a bit of a whim, I called the guy, and bought it. Having never driven a scooter before, and not having a helmet, driving it home at night was one of the more nerve wracking experiences in recent history, but I didn't die, so that was a huge success.
The second day of owning a scooter was a bit of a trial of my scooter faith. I realized I had to get it registered and insured and deal with all these absurd laws and taxes and things that just don't exist for bikes. Then I went to start it and I couldn't get it to start. I tried with the kick start for about 20 minutes, and finally got it, and then turned it off to run in for my stuff, and then when I came back i couldn't get it to work for an hour or so. I finally got a friend to jump start it, so that I could drive it to the inspection place so that I could get it registered, I got there and they failed it for the tire tread, and informed me that I needed a new tire. I had already read that these people were a little over zealous in their problem finding and a little slothful in their problem fixing, so I kindly rejected their offer to fix the tire for $80. Once again, I couldn't get it started, so I had to ask them to jump it, which they graciously did for free. It was a beautiful day though, and driving my scooter home was basically amazing. That day I was talking to my friend about it and he told me of a magical place that would pass scooter inspections in all but the most serious cases. I had hope.
The next day I set off for the Sinclair on Center st. Miraculously, my scooter kickstarted on the third try, and I drove it all the way there without any problems, then I left it running for about half an hour while they took care of everything, so as to recharge the battery. And it passed, with flying colors. I drove it back home, and bought some helmets, so that I would could stop tearing up (from the wind) and stop worrying about dying (from the road). The next day was sunday, and after our weekly brunch I went to show a couple of the girls my scooter. This was a big step in scooter ownership. I tried to start it, but it didn't work, but then the kick start worked relatively easily, and it was lots of fun to give them rides around the parking lot. I resisted the powerful urge to drive the scooter to church, and around town in the afternoon, since I still lacked license, registration, and a helmet.
Anyway, to wrap up: after the initial rocky start, it's been a dream. I managed to take care of my license, registration, and insurance today, and my helmets are in the mail. I had no idea how absurdly fun owning a scooter would be, it's totally worth the money I've spent,
Which brings us back to the budget. Having been wholly unsuccessful in creating a budget, my new budget is that I'm not allowed to buy anything unnecessary during the month of march. We'll see how much money I have when march ends, and then I might continue it through april. We found a really good deal on summer rent though ($65 a month) so I'll catch up pretty quickly.
So that's the saga of how I spent way more money than I should have in the space of about a week, I'll put some pictures up once I take them. That was supposed to happen today, but it got dark before I got around to it. If you find yourself considering buying a scooter, my only advice is to do it quickly. My main regret is that I didn't buy a scooter last year at this time when I was considering it; so much time wasted.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
In which Ammon doesn't talk about Valentines Day
So on sunday I found out about this cool site, roots.cs.byu.edu which is fascinating. It searches through your family tree on the churches database, matches it up with some well known ones, and tells you who you're related to. You can learn lots of interesting things. For example, we're related to everyone. I would be surprised if anyone of british descent, having done a good bit of family history (or having it done for them), that can't find a link to lots of famous people. Apparently Shakespeare, Mark Twain, T.S. Elliot, Joseph Smith, George W. Bush, George Washington, Walt Disney, and the Wright Brothers are all my distant cousins.
What's more interesting is the people we're directly descended from. Aside from a long list of european royalty, which is interesting but not terribly meaningful for me (except for Affonso IV the Brave, King of Portugal), I am a descendent of Francis Cooke, who crossed on the Mayflower, Joseph Knight, and James and Eliza Hurren, who came to utah in the Willie Handcart Company, and their father David Reeder, who died at Fort Laramie on the journey.
On Francis Cooke: as with all genealogy, there's a bit of doubt as to whether or not I'm actually related to him. On familysearch there are two sets of parents listed for one of my ancestors, one goes to Francis Cooke, the other doesn't. Given that they are each equally as likely, it seems like the obvious choice to err on the side of fame. But isn't that sort of depressing for that other branch of possible ancestors that I'm just disowning? I'd hate for my kids to disown me for more interesting parents, but then i suppose it doesn't make a huge difference for them, being long dead and having thousands of descendants anyway. It's just interesting how we have this innate desire to attach ourselves to famous people, as if being a descendent of someone who crossed the ocean in the mayflower about 400 years ago defines who I am in anyway, somehow more so than being descended from someone who crossed the ocean on a lesser known ship slightly less than about 400 years ago.
Either way, I wish I'd known this when I wrote that portuguese paper about my ancestors. Actually, that's silly too. I ended up writing most about my grandparents and great grandparents, people who were actually alive at the same time as me, and whose lives had a significant effect on mine. Is it not absurd to focus less on them than on people that lived centuries ago and whose lives, while more notable, didn't do a whole lot for me? (the closest ancestor is only 1 of 64 others in the same generation of grandparents) I don't know why it's so cool.
Phylogenetically, we're fascinated by the fact that we keep the same Y chromosome as we go along the fathers line and the same Mitochondrial DNA as we go along the mothers line. But these two specific batches of DNA don't have that much of an effect on who we are. Obviously the Y chromosome does a lot, but it doesn't do that much any differently than any other Y chromosome would, and all our other chromosomes also came directly from one of our ancestors (although they do change a little more due to crossing over and such). My point is we like to focus on the stuff we know about. Our Y chromosome is cool because it's the same one everyone with our same last name had, and we can point to that and say, "I have the same Y chromosome as all the other perkes." It's not that it's more significant, it's just more identifiable.
There's just something about us that caused us to want to be able to define ourselves in a way that is generally understood by others. So when I say to someone, "I'm descended from Ammon Vail" that means nothing to them, regardless of what it means to me, but when I say "I'm descended from a passenger on the Mayflower" that means something. In addition, we like to define ourselves by the actions of our ancestors, and so it means more to us when we find famous people, not just because everyone else knows what they did, but because we know what they did, unlike the hundreds of names without any distinct identity.
What's more interesting is the people we're directly descended from. Aside from a long list of european royalty, which is interesting but not terribly meaningful for me (except for Affonso IV the Brave, King of Portugal), I am a descendent of Francis Cooke, who crossed on the Mayflower, Joseph Knight, and James and Eliza Hurren, who came to utah in the Willie Handcart Company, and their father David Reeder, who died at Fort Laramie on the journey.
On Francis Cooke: as with all genealogy, there's a bit of doubt as to whether or not I'm actually related to him. On familysearch there are two sets of parents listed for one of my ancestors, one goes to Francis Cooke, the other doesn't. Given that they are each equally as likely, it seems like the obvious choice to err on the side of fame. But isn't that sort of depressing for that other branch of possible ancestors that I'm just disowning? I'd hate for my kids to disown me for more interesting parents, but then i suppose it doesn't make a huge difference for them, being long dead and having thousands of descendants anyway. It's just interesting how we have this innate desire to attach ourselves to famous people, as if being a descendent of someone who crossed the ocean in the mayflower about 400 years ago defines who I am in anyway, somehow more so than being descended from someone who crossed the ocean on a lesser known ship slightly less than about 400 years ago.
Either way, I wish I'd known this when I wrote that portuguese paper about my ancestors. Actually, that's silly too. I ended up writing most about my grandparents and great grandparents, people who were actually alive at the same time as me, and whose lives had a significant effect on mine. Is it not absurd to focus less on them than on people that lived centuries ago and whose lives, while more notable, didn't do a whole lot for me? (the closest ancestor is only 1 of 64 others in the same generation of grandparents) I don't know why it's so cool.
Phylogenetically, we're fascinated by the fact that we keep the same Y chromosome as we go along the fathers line and the same Mitochondrial DNA as we go along the mothers line. But these two specific batches of DNA don't have that much of an effect on who we are. Obviously the Y chromosome does a lot, but it doesn't do that much any differently than any other Y chromosome would, and all our other chromosomes also came directly from one of our ancestors (although they do change a little more due to crossing over and such). My point is we like to focus on the stuff we know about. Our Y chromosome is cool because it's the same one everyone with our same last name had, and we can point to that and say, "I have the same Y chromosome as all the other perkes." It's not that it's more significant, it's just more identifiable.
There's just something about us that caused us to want to be able to define ourselves in a way that is generally understood by others. So when I say to someone, "I'm descended from Ammon Vail" that means nothing to them, regardless of what it means to me, but when I say "I'm descended from a passenger on the Mayflower" that means something. In addition, we like to define ourselves by the actions of our ancestors, and so it means more to us when we find famous people, not just because everyone else knows what they did, but because we know what they did, unlike the hundreds of names without any distinct identity.
Monday, February 6, 2012
Shrimp is the fruit of the sea
Pies are tricky. My mom would always make pies for our birthdays, for holidays, or just for sundays when people were over. I always liked pie, but I don't think I ever appreciated how much is required to make them, nor the staggering number of dishes that get dirty in making a single pie. Pies are also quite small. I would be willing to bet that a large percentage of pies made (which could be represented on some sort of chart) take longer to make than they do to eat. That said, i think there's something deeper and more significant in making the pie itself, some sort of value in the journey that makes it worth doing.
Jambalaya is in some ways the opposite of pie, an anti-pie, if you will. It takes less than an hour to make, feeds lots of people, is simple, relatively cheap (unless you buy jumbo shrimp, which i heartily recommend, if you go for that sort of thing), delicious and satisfying in a way that pie can never be, but does not photograph nearly as well.
I'm sure there is some sort of higher, metaphysical significance to be had here, but I'll leave that to other people. Here are the pictures from yesterday's dinner:
By the way, special thanks to Amy, whose recipe book provided the inspiration and recipe for jambalaya.
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Snips and Snails
I was going to post this on facebook, but I decided it's been too long since I updated my blog. I bought chicken this week and took a stab at making curry, since my chicken was dangerously close to expiring. Some may remember the mango shrimp curry that went really really well. But that was made following very specific instructions, using lots of uppity spices like coriander and cinnamon and I actually didn't do that much of it, I was working more on the naan. This time I sort of just freestyled it after reading what my cooks illustrated book says about curry. So far, it doesn't look nearly as good as our mango shrimp masterpiece, but it does smell like curry. I timed it all perfectly so that the rice would be finished right as the curry was ready, but then i pushed the wrong button, and thirty minutes later as I was finishing the curry, I realized the rice was only warming. That was unfortunate.
Yesterday I was feeling impulsive and trendy, so I went and bought clipless pedals for my bike. I can't wait for a sunny day, a few hours and a wrench (i still need to tighten them a bit more) so that I can go somewhere cool at new, exciting speeds. Between that and the bigger ring they put on, it's going to be intense. I still need to either fix or replace the seat, which got a bit bent in the great bike accident of 2011, but we're close.
By the way, the curry ended up just a little bitter, and pretty spicy, but it was still good. Our house smells like curry and probably will for a while. So that's fun stuff.
Otherwise, life's been good for the past couple months since I've written last. Christmas came and went, new years came and I made some goals, but not resolutions, which is good, because I would have failed by now. I think resolutions are silly. But I still have some goals that I'm slowly working on. I'm exercising more (and playing soccer!), I've got a date on friday, and I'm managing to read scriptures effectively and consistently, most of the time. I lost my keys, which just recently turned up. I also lost my jacket, which sort of perplexes me, so hopefully that will turn up soon. I made one of my favorite made gifts I've made to date, a homemade Carcassonne, hopefully Dylan's gotten it by now so it won't ruin the month late surprise. It turned out really well, one of my rare crafty moments. School is deceptively easy so far, I'm pretty sure they're luring me into a false sense of security. Work's been good, I get to set all my own hours and work more or less, depending on how much time I have. So yes, life is great.
By the way, the curry ended up just a little bitter, and pretty spicy, but it was still good. Our house smells like curry and probably will for a while. So that's fun stuff.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)